At the beginning of all there was no time. Can not speak of " time" in which nothing was because, since nothing is nothing, nothing can not exist (can not "be anything"). So, if we want to imagine what the world would soon have the world would be doomed to absurdity: before world have had no world and therefore there was no time. Therefore, we can not speak for a moment "before" the existence of the world. However, it can not rationally assert that since there was no world, not even time or empty space was nothing. That too is impossible.
Nothingness is nothing but an illusion that is formed in the human mind precisely by the fact that man knows of the existence of the world and existence itself. The human individual knows that he is, he's alive and knows that, like any living being, just as he was born, die. Then we look around and imagine what would happen if everything around us, as if the world were a huge group of people, disappeared. We take the idea that everything had a kind of death and reality disappear ... And it appears to us the fatal idea: There would be nothing! At the same time, imagine how things would be if, as happened with our own birth, had not been born yet none of the realities of the world. "What would have before the birth of reality?" We wonder. And again, the recurring theme: There would be nothing! There would be no reality! And, at this point, we reach the false conclusion before being before the world that I had was "nothing."
But to claim the existence of nothing, assert the existence of "non-existence" is a patent absurdity. Saying "there is nothing" is gibberish unacceptable by our reason.
What was therefore the beginning of everything? Obviously the only thing that could happen is "being" reality. At the same ceremony showed the reality and time, in the same "moment" came the first time with the first glimmer of reality. Ask for the existence of something "before" the advent of time and reality is nonsense to which our reason can not access.
Can we say, then, that reality is eternal? What has been be, Haber for infinite time? Not exactly. We can say that being (the "Being the world rather than not having") has always existed, that is, there has been a time when there was not any reality. But we can not say that the time we go to the past for the first principle is infinite. The world, reality, existence, Haber has a beginning, a first instant, a first appear.
can happen that fall into the fallacy of asking "Who was the cause of that first moment, or more specifically," who created the world, "but then we'd pretend that before time, before the emergence of what was real something (there was a time, these moments before, and had a reality-the creator or demiurge-), but we have made it clear that asking for that instant before time for a reality or prior to the existence of reality is a absurd.
We have no rational possibility to claim that reality (inextricably linked to time and space) emerged itself from itself, without previous elements that make this possible. Might say metaphorically that, in a kind of timeless suspension, everything was real and latent (potential) waiting to be shown, to function, to open the world and establish itself as reality.
And that's when, from that point of infinite energy (or "infinite potential") and also infinite smallness (equivalent to lack of space and time) appears, explosively (Big Bang) the real. All of a sudden, possible without external cause from which arise. Where is God or the gods in this story? I do not know. Certainly can not be before the world before the truth. The real, the existence, which Haber (the gods, or God) may form part, not dependent on these deities. They are the gods who in any case rely on the world. And if the gods were unrelated to reality ... for then would be non-real, ie non-existent.
But to claim the existence of nothing, assert the existence of "non-existence" is a patent absurdity. Saying "there is nothing" is gibberish unacceptable by our reason.
What was therefore the beginning of everything? Obviously the only thing that could happen is "being" reality. At the same ceremony showed the reality and time, in the same "moment" came the first time with the first glimmer of reality. Ask for the existence of something "before" the advent of time and reality is nonsense to which our reason can not access.
Can we say, then, that reality is eternal? What has been be, Haber for infinite time? Not exactly. We can say that being (the "Being the world rather than not having") has always existed, that is, there has been a time when there was not any reality. But we can not say that the time we go to the past for the first principle is infinite. The world, reality, existence, Haber has a beginning, a first instant, a first appear.
can happen that fall into the fallacy of asking "Who was the cause of that first moment, or more specifically," who created the world, "but then we'd pretend that before time, before the emergence of what was real something (there was a time, these moments before, and had a reality-the creator or demiurge-), but we have made it clear that asking for that instant before time for a reality or prior to the existence of reality is a absurd.
We have no rational possibility to claim that reality (inextricably linked to time and space) emerged itself from itself, without previous elements that make this possible. Might say metaphorically that, in a kind of timeless suspension, everything was real and latent (potential) waiting to be shown, to function, to open the world and establish itself as reality.
And that's when, from that point of infinite energy (or "infinite potential") and also infinite smallness (equivalent to lack of space and time) appears, explosively (Big Bang) the real. All of a sudden, possible without external cause from which arise. Where is God or the gods in this story? I do not know. Certainly can not be before the world before the truth. The real, the existence, which Haber (the gods, or God) may form part, not dependent on these deities. They are the gods who in any case rely on the world. And if the gods were unrelated to reality ... for then would be non-real, ie non-existent.
0 comments:
Post a Comment